Wednesday, December 3, 2008

The government legalized drugs

Just not the American government. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7757050.stm There is a video along with the article.

"Supporters say it has had positive results - getting long-term addicts out of Switzerland's once notorious "needle parks" and reducing drug-related crime."

Well that's a good thing... right? I think so.

Frankly, I think the war on drugs has been a disaster.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

GOP reformation

It's been said by everyone, so I might as well say it too: the GOP needs to be reformed!

What TURNS PEOPLE OFF is Republican social policies, and the Republicans won't budge. People gladly flock to the communists (liberals) because the voters care more about social policies than economic ones.

Us smart people know that economics matter 1000x more, and is what makes or breaks the entire country, but the masses do not.

The GOP needs to reform its social policy and get some voters back, or watch us become the U.S.S.A.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Obama's grandmother

We all heard the news about Obama's grandmother dying, it's old news. But I was thinking, WHAT 47-year-old has a living grandmother in the first place? 47!

She and Obama's mother must have been whores.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Is this the typical lib?

Or is this satire?



Oh my god, what the fuck was that?

Monday, November 24, 2008

Michelle Obama is a nig...

...gard.

nig·gard
n.
A stingy, grasping person; a miser.

What was all that about 'giving up a piece of your pie so someone else can have more'? What was that her husband was talking about when he said 'When you spread the wealth around it's good for everybody'?

It looks like the Obamas forgot to spread their wealth.

Michelle was complaining about not being able to afford piano lessons for her kids. First of all, B.S., and secondly, what the hell kind of complaint is that if it was true? Some people in America can't afford FOOD for their kids. You're pretty well off now, Michelle, spread your wealth! You don't need a government mandate.

Now they're sending their kids to private school! The ultimate hypocrisy. You would think they would send their kids to public school, and send all that extra money to the less fortunate for food and clothes, but not the Obamas!

Biden's givings to charity have been even lower. He's a miserable, greedy creature.

You know, libs, you can write checks to the government. You don't need to wait for higher taxes, you can do it now! But we all know you won't. You gauge your generosity by how much you tell others to give.

The old saying is more true now than ever: Conservatives are generous with their own money. Liberals are generous with other people's money.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Ooh the Fairness Doctrine

Voltaire said something like "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" (I am not going to look up the quote because I don't care enough).

Liberals say "I may not agree with what you say, so I will vigorously pass legislation in order to turn your listeners off!"

Liberals dominate the TV, and conservatives dominate the radio. That's just the way it is for some reason*. The Fairness Doctrine, which lib traitors like Pelosi and Reid are trying to pass, ONLY applies to radio. How subtle!

Conservative commentators will have to give equal time to the opposition, but lib commentators on TV have no such requirement. This is America, right? Surely freedom of speech implies the freedom to express one's unaltered opinions without having to also express someone else's? Not according to Nazi liberals. "Say what the liberal fascist government wants you to say OR ELSE!!!"

How long do you think it will take before the Nazis (liberals) get the Fairness Doctrine in youtube also?


*Actually, we do know why. Conservatives listen to the radio on the way to work, because we actually have jobs. Libs spend all their time at home sitting around watching TV, collecting welfare. That's why conservative TV shows fail, and lib talk radio fails.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Change =/= Progress

I love how libs are now trying to equate change with progress, and use them interchangably. This is a message from an actual lib: "Small c conservatism is a philosophy. One of preventing change. Surely the opposite of progression."

Wow. Conservatism is the opposite of progression...

Conservatives are poised on preventing BAD change. BAD change is not progress. We keep telling you communism is a BAD idea. Switching over to it is change, yes, but not progress.

And that's why your new name, 'progressives', will be become sullied also.